AI image generators like Adobe Firefly, Midjourney, DALL·E, and Leonardo AI have revolutionized the art world—but not without creating serious legal and ethical concerns about AI art copyright and privacy. Read about AI art copyright and privacy scandals.
Creators everywhere are asking critical questions:
- Where do my prompts and images go?
- Are my creations being used to train third-party AI models?
- Who owns the rights to AI-generated images?
In recent years, several major platforms have faced scandals, lawsuits, and public backlash. This article explores why the demand for offline alternatives is growing—and why Deep Art Creator Pro is the tool of choice for artists, designers, and agencies who value AI art copyright and privacy.
Adobe Firefly – AI Art Copyright and the Terms of Service Scandal That Shook the Industry
In 2023, Adobe made headlines:
In 2023 and 2024, Adobe updated its Terms of Service for Creative Cloud and Firefly, granting the company sweeping rights over user-generated content. According to section 4.2, Adobe could:
- Use, reproduce, modify, and process user content
- Access even confidential projects
- Potentially use materials to train its own AI models
The backlash was swift. Many creatives felt stripped of their rights and feared for the security of their data. Adobe later published blog posts attempting to clarify their position, but for many, the trust was already broken.
Wired reported that despite Adobe’s reassurances, many artists still feel uneasy about what Adobe might do with their data. (Wired)
Midjourney – Public Prompts, AI Art Copyright Confusion, and Privacy Grey Zones
Midjourney follows a community model: All prompts and generated images are public by default. Only the highest-tier Pro subscription allows private usage.
Their Terms of Service grant broad usage rights, including:
- Storing and using prompts and outputs
- Leveraging user data to improve AI models
In 2023, controversy grew when users accused Midjourney V6 of copying copyrighted works almost identically. Even worse, the platform banned users who criticized these issues instead of addressing them openly.
The big question remains: Are your data—and your rights—safe with Midjourney?
DALL·E – Image Rights and Opaque Data Practices
OpenAI’s DALL·E has faced similar scrutiny:
- Initially, OpenAI claimed full rights to generated content
- Later, ownership was transferred to users—but global legal clarity is still lacking
- Prompts and outputs can still be stored for training purposes
In addition, strict content filters frustrate artists who want to explore controversial or experimental themes. For many, this raises red flags about censorship and loss of creative autonomy.
Stable Diffusion & Leonardo AI – Training Data and AI Copyright Lawsuits
Stable Diffusion, the engine powering Leonardo AI and many others, was trained on billions of web images—many without consent from the original creators.
Consequences include:
- A high-profile lawsuit from Getty Images
- Class action lawsuits by artists accusing companies of copyright violations
According to TLT TechKnow, Getty Images alleges that Stability AI used over 12 million images without license—including many with watermarks. (TLT)
Even if your work is ethical, your AI tool’s foundation may not be.why privacy-conscious creators are turning to offline solutions.
In 2025, Privacy and Copyright Are Key Buying Decisions
Users increasingly demand answers:
- Where does my data go?
- Is my art being used to train someone else’s AI?
- Who guarantees that I retain my rights?
These scandals have revealed a pattern:
❌ Cloud-based AI tools often lack legal clarity
❌ Terms grant companies excessive rights—often buried in fine print
❌ Artists have little control over their own creations once uploaded
Deep Art Creator Pro – The Safer Offline Alternative
The Offline Tool That Protects AI Art Copyright and Privacy
Deep Art Creator Pro was built around transparency, ownership, and privacy:
✅ No data storage: Prompts and images stay on your device
✅ No cloud uploads: All processes are local
✅ Full ownership: You own what you create
✅ No content filters: Total artistic freedom
Especially under GDPR in Europe and similar laws elsewhere, this offline approach is becoming the standard for privacy-focused professionals.e approach is gaining traction among agencies, professionals, and individual creators alike.
Conclusion – Create Without Compromising AI Art Copyright and Privacy
The scandals surrounding Adobe, Midjourney, DALL·E, and Stability AI show one thing clearly:
Control over your data and creative output is no longer optional.
For artists and agencies who value privacy, copyright protection, and independence, offline tools like Deep Art Creator Pro are the future. and peace of mind.
Discover Deep Art Creator Pro now – and protect your data, your rights, and your creativity. Work offline. No cloud. No compromise.